[Nov 30, 2024] Ultimate ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Guide to Prepare Free Latest PECB Practice Tests Dumps [Q14-Q34]

[Nov 30, 2024] Ultimate ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Guide to Prepare Free Latest PECB Practice Tests Dumps

Get Top-Rated PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps Now

NEW QUESTION # 14
An audit team leader arrives at a printing organisation to carry out a Stage 2 audit for a certification body. At a meeting with the Quality Manager, she is told that they have won their biggest contract from a computer manufacturer to print and compile computer documentation packages. They have leased the unit next door for space reasons but have never worked in this sector before. The Quality Manager wants the ISO 9001 certificate to cover the new contract.
During the audit, a team member finds that a number of print jobs have been rejected by several clients over a number of months due to spelling errors in the print run. The Print Manager blames the new employees they had to take on because of a big contract. The auditor raises a nonconformance against clause 10.2.1.b of ISO
9001.
Which one of the evidence statements would support this finding?

• A. The organisation did not provide the correct resources to prevent nonconformity.
• B. The actions taken to deal with customer complaints did not prevent recurrence of the problem.
• C. There was no record that the organisation evaluated the effectiveness of the training given to new employees.
• D. There was no evidence that a check of spelling took place before the release of printing to the client.

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to clause 10.2.1.b of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should evaluate the need for action to eliminate the causes of nonconformities, in order to prevent their recurrence. This means that the organization should identify and address the root causes and contributing factors of the nonconformities, and implement appropriate corrective actions that are effective and proportional to the impact of the nonconformities. In this case, the evidence statement that supports the finding of nonconformance is C, because it shows that the organization did not take effective actions to prevent the recurrence of the spelling errors in the print run, which resulted in repeated customer rejections and dissatisfaction. The other options are not directly related to clause 10.2.1.b, although they may indicate other nonconformities or weaknesses in the organization's QMS.
For example, option A may relate to clause 7.2 on competence, option B may relate to clause 8.6 on release of products and services, and option D may relate to clause 7.1 on resources. References: ISO 9001:2015, [ISO
9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Nonconformity and Corrective Action], ISO 9001 Clause 10.
Improvement - ISO-templates.com

NEW QUESTION # 15
You will lead a third-party audit next Monday on ABC, an organisation that provides services for cleaning windows from the outside of tall buildings. They work on demand, and usually have 4-5 orders per week. All documented information on these activities is kept at the central office.
On Friday evening, before the audit, you are informed by mail that customers cancelled all orders for the next week; therefore, the auditors will not have the chance to see them working at the customer's premises, but the field supervisors will be available at the ABC offices.
You have prepared the audit plan and the checklist. Choose the best action you would take:

• A. Complete the audit but ask the quality manager to clean some windows at the ABC's office, simulating the process they carry out at customers' premises.
• B. Ask the Certification Body you work for how to proceed with the audit.
• C. Start the audit on Monday at ABC's as planned, interviewing the functions that regularly work at the central office, and plan visits to ABC customers wherever they may be working during the following week.
• D. Start the audit on Monday as planned, interviewing the functions that regularly work at the central office, and visit another customer's premises they cleaned the week before.

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.3.3, the audit plan should be reviewed and revised as necessary to address changes that occur during the audit planning. The audit plan should be agreed upon, preferably in writing, by the audit team leader, the audit client and the auditee1. Therefore, if there is a significant change in the auditee's situation, such as the cancellation of all orders for the next week, the audit plan should be reviewed and revised accordingly, with the agreement of all parties involved.
According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, clause 9.1.4, the certification body should have a process to ensure that the audit team has the competence to achieve the audit objectives, and that the audit methods are appropriate for the scope and complexity of the audit. The certification body should also have a process to ensure that the audit is conducted under reasonable conditions and within a reasonable time frame2. Therefore, if there is a risk that the audit objectives cannot be achieved, or that the audit methods are not suitable, due to the change in the auditee's situation, the certification body should be consulted and informed on how to proceed with the audit.
Therefore, the best action to take is B, ask the certification body you work for how to proceed with the audit.
This action will ensure that the audit plan is revised and agreed upon by all parties, and that the audit team has the competence and the methods to conduct the audit effectively and efficiently. The other options are not correct, as they may compromise the quality and validity of the audit:
*A. Start the audit on Monday at ABC's as planned, interviewing the functions that regularly work at the central office, and plan visits to ABC customers wherever they may be working during the following week:
This action may not be feasible or acceptable, as it may extend the audit duration and cost beyond the agreed terms, and it may not provide sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to verify the conformity and effectiveness of the auditee's processes. Moreover, this action may not be agreed upon by the audit client and the auditee, and it may not be approved by the certification body.
*C. Start the audit on Monday as planned, interviewing the functions that regularly work at the central office, and visit another customer's premises they cleaned the week before: This action may not be relevant or reliable, as it may not reflect the current performance and condition of the auditee's processes. The audit evidence collected from the previous customer may not be valid or representative of the audit criteria, and it may not address the risks and opportunities associated with the auditee's context and objectives. Moreover, this action may not be agreed upon by the audit client and the auditee, and it may not be approved by the certification body.
*D. Complete the audit but ask the quality manager to clean some windows at the ABC's office, simulating the process they carry out at customers' premises: This action may not be objective or impartial, as it may introduce bias and influence in the audit process. The audit evidence collected from the simulated process may not be accurate or authentic, and it may not demonstrate the actual capability and effectiveness of the auditee's processes. Moreover, this action may not be ethical or professional, as it may compromise the integrity and credibility of the audit and the certification.
References: ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems, ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015(en), Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems
- Part 1: Requirements

NEW QUESTION # 16
Which of the following two documents does an auditor need to prepare and complete prior to the on-site audit?

• A. Procedures
• B. Audit Plan
• C. Checklist / Prompts
• D. Risk Matrices
• E. Audit Report
• F. Findings

Answer: B,C

Explanation:
According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.3, the audit plan is a document that provides the basis for agreement regarding the conduct of the audit. The audit plan should include the information listed in my previous response, such as the audit objectives, scope, criteria, schedule, team, methods, report, etc. The audit plan should be prepared and completed prior to the on-site audit, and should be communicated to the audit team and the auditee1.
According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.4.3, the checklist / prompts are documents that list the questions or topics that need to be covered during an audit. The checklist / prompts can help the auditor to collect and verify information relevant to the audit criteria, and to ensure the consistency and completeness of the audit.
The checklist / prompts should be prepared and completed prior to the on-site audit, and should be based on the audit plan and the audit scope and objectives1.
Therefore, the two documents that an auditor needs to prepare and complete prior to the on-site audit are B and D, as they are essential for planning and conducting the audit. The other options are not correct, as they are either prepared or completed after the on-site audit, or not required by the standard:
*A. Audit Report: The audit report is a document that provides a complete, accurate, concise, and clear record of the audit. The audit report should include the information listed in my previous response, such as the audit objectives, scope, criteria, findings, conclusions, etc. The audit report should be prepared and completed after the on-site audit, and should be distributed to the audit client and the auditee1.
*C. Procedures: Procedures are documents that specify the way activities are to be performed. Procedures may be part of the audit criteria, if they are part of the organization's management system, or part of the audit programme, if they are part of the certification body's or registrar's requirements. Procedures are not prepared or completed by the auditor prior to the on-site audit, but rather reviewed or followed by the auditor during the audit1.
*E. Risk Matrices: Risk matrices are tools that help to assess and prioritize the risks and opportunities associated with the audit programme or the audit. Risk matrices may be part of the audit programme management, if they are used to determine and evaluate the audit programme risks and opportunities, or part of the audit preparation, if they are used to determine and evaluate the audit risks and opportunities. Risk matrices are not prepared or completed by the auditor prior to the on-site audit, but rather used or updated by the auditor during the audit programme management or the audit preparation1.
*F. Findings: Findings are the results of the evaluation of the collected audit evidence against the audit criteria.
Findings can indicate either conformity or nonconformity, as well as positive aspects or opportunities for improvement. Findings are not prepared or completed by the auditor prior to the on-site audit, but rather generated and recorded by the auditor during the audit activities1.
References: ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems

NEW QUESTION # 17
Below are four of the seven principles on which ISO 9000 series are based. Match a potential benefit to each of the quality management principles (QMP).

Answer:

Explanation:

Explanation:
A screenshot of a chat Description automatically generated

According to the ISO 9000:2015 document, the seven quality management principles are:
Customer focus
Leadership
Engagement of people
Process approach
Improvement
Evidence-based decision making
Relationship management
For each principle, the document provides a statement, a rationale, key benefits, and actions you can take to apply the principle in your organization.
Based on the document, here is a possible way to match a potential benefit to each of the four quality management principles you mentioned:
Table
Quality management principle
Potential benefit
Customer focus
Increased revenue and market share
Engagement of people
Enhanced trust and collaboration throughout the organization
Improvement
Enhanced drive for innovation
Evidence-based decision making
Increased ability to demonstrate effectiveness of past actions

NEW QUESTION # 18
Select the term which best describes the quality management system process of modifying a non-conforming product to bring it within acceptance criteria.

• A. Corrective action
• B. Concession
• C. Preventive action
• D. Correction

Answer: D

Explanation:
According to the ISO 9000:2015 - Quality management systems - Fundamentals and vocabulary, correction is defined as "action to eliminate a detected nonconformity". A nonconformity is defined as "non-fulfilment of a requirement". Therefore, the process of modifying a non-conforming product to bring it within acceptance criteria is a correction, as it eliminates the non-fulfilment of the product specification. The other options are not correct, as they have different definitions and purposes:
*Concession: permission to release or use a nonconforming product, service or process
*Corrective action: action to eliminate the cause of a nonconformity and to prevent recurrence
*Preventive action: action to eliminate the cause of a potential nonconformity or other undesirable potential situation References: ISO 9000:2015 - Quality management systems - Fundamentals and vocabulary, ISO 9001 nonconforming product: How to understand dispositions - Advisera

NEW QUESTION # 19
In the context of a management system audit, identify the sequence of a typical process for collecting and verifying information. The first one has been done for you.
To complete the sequence click on the blank section you want to complete so it is highlighted in red and then click on the applicable text from the options below. Alternatively, drag and drop the options to the appropriate blank section.

Answer:

Explanation:

Explanation:
Identifying the source of information
Sampling available data
Gathering audit evidence
Verifying objective evidence
Evaluating evidence against the audit criteria
Making audit conclusions
Evaluating against the audit criteria
According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.4, the process of collecting and verifying information during an audit involves the following steps1:
Identifying the source of information: The audit team should identify the sources of information that are relevant to the audit objectives, scope and criteria. These sources may include documents, records, personnel, processes, activities, facilities, equipment, etc. The audit team should also determine the methods and tools for accessing and collecting the information, such as interviews, observations, document review, sampling, etc.
Sampling available data: The audit team should select a representative sample of the available data to verify the conformity and effectiveness of the management system. The sample size and selection method should be based on the audit objectives, scope and criteria, as well as the level of confidence and risk. The audit team should also consider the validity, reliability, relevance and sufficiency of the data.
Gathering audit evidence: The audit team should use the methods and tools identified in the previous step to collect audit evidence, which is the records, statements of fact or other information that are relevant to the audit criteria and verifiable. The audit team should record the audit evidence in a clear, concise and objective manner, using notes, checklists, photographs, audio or video recordings, etc.
Verifying objective evidence: The audit team should verify the accuracy, completeness and authenticity of the audit evidence collected. This may involve cross-checking different sources of information, confirming the identity and authority of the persons providing the information, examining the original documents or records, etc. The audit team should also identify any discrepancies, inconsistencies or gaps in the audit evidence.
Evaluating evidence against the audit criteria: The audit team should compare the audit evidence with the audit criteria to determine the extent of conformity and nonconformity. The audit team should also identify any opportunities for improvement, best practices, positive aspects or potential risks. The audit team should use professional judgement and apply the principles of auditing when evaluating the audit evidence.
Making audit conclusions: The audit team should consolidate the audit findings and evaluate the overall performance and effectiveness of the management system. The audit team should also consider the audit objectives, scope and criteria, as well as the context and expectations of the auditee and other interested parties. The audit team should provide a clear, concise and objective statement of the audit conclusions, which may include the degree of conformity, the achievement of the intended outcomes, the need for corrective actions, the suitability for certification, etc.
Evaluating against the audit criteria: The audit team should review the audit conclusions and ensure that they are consistent with the audit criteria and supported by sufficient and appropriate audit evidence.
The audit team should also ensure that the audit conclusions are communicated to the auditee and other relevant parties in a timely and effective manner, using the agreed audit report format and distribution method.
References: ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems

NEW QUESTION # 20
In the context of a third-party certification audit, match the roles with the following responsibilities:

Answer:

Explanation:

Explanation:
In the context of a third-party certification audit, match the roles with the following responsibilities:
Responsibilities:
Conduct the audit to the assigned area.= Auditors
Assist the auditors in identifying personnel to participate in the audit.= Guide Assign each team member's responsibility for the audit.= Audit team leader Respond to questions and provide evidence to the auditor.= Auditee According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 3, the definitions of the roles are as follows1:
Auditors: persons with the competence to conduct an audit
Guide: person appointed by the auditee to assist the audit team
Auditee: organization being audited
Audit team leader: member of an audit team appointed to manage the audit or an audit team Therefore, the roles can be matched to the responsibilities based on these definitions and the description of the audit process in clause 6 of the standard1.
References: ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems

NEW QUESTION # 21
Which one of the following options best describes the purpose of a Stage 1 third-party audit?

• A. To determine the auditees understanding of ISO 9001.
• B. To learn about the organisation's procurement processes.
• C. To get to know the organisation's customers.
• D. To introduce the audit team to the client.

Answer: A

Explanation:
The purpose of a Stage 1 third-party audit is to determine an organization's readiness for their Stage 2 Certification Audit. During the Stage 1, the auditor will review the organization's management system documented information, evaluate the site-specific conditions, and have discussions with personnel. The objective is to assess the alignment of the organization's design with ISO 9001 requirements and to identify any areas of concern that could be classified as a nonconformance during the Stage 2 Audit. The auditor will also use the Stage 1 Audit to complete Stage 2 Audit planning, including a review of the allocation of resources and details for the next phase of the audit. Therefore, the option that best describes the purpose of a Stage 1 third-party audit is A, to determine the auditees understanding of ISO 9001. The other options are not correct, as they are not the main focus of a Stage 1 audit:
*B. To get to know the organization's customers: This is not the purpose of a Stage 1 audit, as the auditor is not interested in the specific details of the organization's customers, but rather in the organization's ability to meet customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements.
*C. To learn about the organization's procurement processes: This is not the purpose of a Stage 1 audit, as the auditor is not interested in the specific details of the organization's procurement processes, but rather in the organization's ability to control externally provided processes, products and services.
*D. To introduce the audit team to the client: This is not the purpose of a Stage 1 audit, as the auditor is not there to make introductions, but rather to conduct a preliminary examination of the organization's compliance with ISO 9001 standards.
References: What is the difference between Stage 1 and Stage 2 Audits? - ISO Update, The ISO 9001 Audit Process Explained | ISO Explained, What is an ISO Stage 2 Audit? - RiskOptics - Reciprocity

NEW QUESTION # 22
Which two of the following are included in the objectives of the 'Stage 1 initial certification audit'?

• A. To evaluate the operational processes of the organisation.
• B. To evaluate the preparedness of the organisation for a Stage 2 audit.
• C. To evaluate the performance of monitoring and reviewing activities.
• D. To make a decision on certification to ISO 9001:2015.
• E. To review the quality manual.
• F. To evaluate the internal audit and management review processes.

Answer: B,E

Explanation:
*To evaluate the preparedness of the organisation for a Stage 2 audit: This objective involves assessing the readiness of the organisation to undergo the Stage 2 audit, where the conformity and effectiveness of the quality management system will be verified123. The audit team will check the level of implementation and understanding of the quality management system, identify any major gaps or nonconformities, and confirm the audit scope, criteria, and plan123.
*To review the quality manual: This objective involves reviewing the documented information of the quality management system, such as the quality policy, the quality objectives, the scope, the processes, and the procedures, to ensure that they meet the requirements of ISO 9001:2015123. The audit team will also evaluate the organisation's understanding and application of the standard, and identify any areas of improvement or concern123.
The other options are not included in the objectives of the Stage 1 initial certification audit, according to the web search results from my internal tool. They may be related to other stages or types of audits, but they are not the focus of the Stage 1 audit.
Therefore, the correct answer is B and D.
References: 1: ISO 9001 Certification Audits | Stage 1 and Stage 2 - 9001. Simplified 2: Stage 1 of your Audit
| NQA Blog 3: Getting Certified to ISO 9001 - the Stage 1 Audit

NEW QUESTION # 23
You are an auditor from a construction organisation who is conducting a second party audit to ISO 9001 at a steel rolling mill producing structural steelwork. When auditing the rolling process, you find that the operator who is unloading the furnace does not use the adjacent infrared pyrometer to measure the appropriate product temperature in readiness for the next production stage.
You: "How do you tell when the billet is ready for the rolling stage?"
Operator: "I've done this job for 20 years. I can tell by the bright red colour." You: "What happens if the colour is wrong?" Operator: "The billet goes back into the furnace." You: "Is the pyrometer ever used?" Operator: "Only in borderline cases." You continue to interview the operator and find that around 25% of the billets are sent back to the furnace.
This includes 80% of the borderline cases.
Select three options that would provide evidence of conformance with clause 9.1.1 of ISO 9001.

• A. Certification of conformance to national standards from the manufacture of the pyrometer.
• B. Annual review records for furnace operators.
• C. A procedure that provides instruction in taking billet temperature.
• D. Planning for monitoring and measuring the billet temperature.
• E. An increase in the use of the pyrometer by operators.
• F. Maintenance plan for the furnace.
• G. A quality objective to achieve lower recycle rates for billets.
• H. Periodic analysis of the results of temperature checks.

Answer: C,D,H

Explanation:
According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 9.1.1, the organization is required to determine what needs to be monitored and measured, the methods for monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation, as applicable, to ensure valid results, and when the monitoring and measuring shall be performed. The organization is also required to retain appropriate documented information as evidence of the results.
Therefore, in the scenario given, the organization should have planned for monitoring and measuring the billet temperature, as it is a critical factor for the quality of the product and the process. The organization should also have established a procedure that provides instruction in taking billet temperature, using the pyrometer or other suitable methods, to ensure consistency and accuracy. The organization should also have performed periodic analysis of the results of temperature checks, to identify trends, problems, and opportunities for improvement.
Hence, the options that would provide evidence of conformance with clause 9.1.1 of ISO 9001 are A, E, and F, as they are aligned with the requirements of the clause. The other options are either irrelevant or not directly related to clause 9.1.1, as they do not pertain to the monitoring and measurement of the billet temperature.
References:
ISO 9001:2015(en), Quality management systems - Requirements, clause 9.1.1 ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.4.4 and 6.7.2 ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Training Course | IRCA Certified | BSI, section "Learning objectives" ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Course Material | 3FOLD Education Centre, module 5 and 6

NEW QUESTION # 24
You are carrying out an audit at a single-site organisation seeking certification to ISO 9001 for the first time.
The organisation manufactures
cosmetics for major retailers.
You are interviewing the Manufacturing Manager (MM).
You: "I would like to begin by looking at the cleaning controls."
MM: "We record the cleaning of the equipment at the end of every batch. This document details the minimum cleaning frequency and the procedures to follow for all areas and each item of equipment. The person who carries out the cleaning puts their initial on the document and records the time and date alongside." Narrative: You sample production records over 3-days and note down evidence of nonconformity as per the table below.

Answer:

Explanation:

NEW QUESTION # 25
During a second-party audit, the auditor examines the records that are available for the external provider, ABC Forgings, to whom manufacturing has recently been outsourced.
There are standard external provider checklists for three competitors for the contract and there are inspection records from the trial manufacturing batches produced by ABC Forgings. There is no documented evidence of the criteria used to confirm the appointment of ABC Forgings, and no contract or terms and conditions.
Ongoing monitoring indicates that external provider performance is satisfactory, but no documented information has been retained.
Select two options for the evidence which demonstrates a nonconformity with clause 8.4 of ISO 9001.

• A. The auditee trusted the external provider because of a long-standing relationship with them.
• B. There was no documentation which provided evidence of any monitoring of the external provider.
• C. There were no receipt inspection records of the incoming materials.
• D. The external provider asked for the contract details to be verbal only.
• E. The auditee required the outsourced products on an urgent basis before the completion of the paperwork.
• F. The auditee did not retain documentation on the selection and evaluation of the external provider.

Answer: B,F

Explanation:
According to clause 8.4 of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should ensure that externally provided processes, products, and services conform to the specified requirements. To do so, the organization should:
*Establish the criteria for the selection, evaluation, and re-evaluation of external providers, based on their ability to provide processes, products, and services in accordance with the requirements. The criteria should be documented and applied consistently.
*Evaluate the potential external providers before selecting them, using the established criteria. The evaluation methods may include questionnaires, audits, references, samples, etc. The results of the evaluation should be documented and reviewed.
*Select the external providers that have demonstrated their competence and conformity to the requirements.
The selection should be based on the evaluation results and the organization's needs. The selection should be documented and approved.
*Communicate the requirements for the processes, products, and services to be provided by the external provider, including the verification and validation activities, the acceptance criteria, the documentation requirements, the changes control, etc. The communication methods may include purchase orders, contracts, agreements, etc. The communication should be clear, complete, and timely.
*Monitor the performance and conformity of the external provider, using the established criteria and methods.
The monitoring methods may include inspections, tests, audits, feedback, complaints, etc. The monitoring results should be documented and analyzed.
In this case, the evidence statements that demonstrate a nonconformity with clause 8.4 are A and C, because they show that the organization did not retain documented information of the selection and evaluation of the external provider, and the monitoring of the external provider's performance. These are requirements of the standard and essential for ensuring the quality of the externally provided processes, products, and services.
The other options are not directly related to clause 8.4, although they may indicate other nonconformities or weaknesses in the organization's QMS. For example, option B may relate to clause 7.1.3 on contingency planning, option D may relate to clause 8.2.3 on review of requirements, option E may relate to clause 8.6 on release of products and services, and option F may relate to clause 5.1.1 on leadership and commitment.
References: ISO 9001:2015, [ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Scope], Mastering the Scope of ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems

NEW QUESTION # 26
You work for an organisation, 'A', which provides packaged food to the public. You are asked to lead a team (you as the leader and two other auditors) to audit a supplier, 'B', which provides packaging materials to your organisation. It is 4 p.m. and the audit is close to an end; you are having an internal meeting with the team to decide what will be presented to the auditee during the Closing meeting.
The Closing meeting was scheduled
for 5 p.m.
You, as audit team leader, audited top management, the laboratory, and the storage of raw materials.
Auditor 1 audited the two manufacturing lines and dispatch areas.
You to Auditor 1: "What findings would you report?"
Auditor 1: "When reviewing the Dispatch records, I noticed that during the morning two different trucks (Number 011 and 025) delivered the same batch number of the product (Batch 33555). Truck 011 left the plant at 9.15 am and Truck 025 left the plant at
11.30 am. Procedure P-02 Rev.3 says
that trucks should carry a complete batch. The batch number, once on the truck, is captured using a QR device." You: "OK, what do you think?" Auditor 2: "I think that this is a nonconformity." You: "OK. How would you describe the evidence on which the nonconformity will be based"?
Identify which one of the following statements best describes the identified nonconformity.

• A. Dispatch personnel are not fully aware of the need to conform to written procedures.
• B. Dispatch personnel do not always carry out its activities in conformance with Procedure P-02 rev 3.
• C. A product delivered to the client was not identified as required in P-02 Rev 3.
• D. The batch 33555 was delivered split in two different trucks (011 and 025).

Answer: D

Explanation:
According to the definition in ISO 9000, a nonconformity is "non-fulfillment of a requirement". There are three parts to a well-documented nonconformity: the audit evidence to support auditor findings; a record of the requirement against which the nonconformity is detected; and the statement of nonconformity1. In this case, the audit evidence is the dispatch records that show the same batch number of the product being delivered by two different trucks at different times. The requirement is the procedure P-02 Rev.3 that says that trucks should carry a complete batch. The statement of nonconformity is that the batch 33555 was delivered split in two different trucks (011 and 025), which does not conform to the procedure. Therefore, option C best describes the identified nonconformity, as it includes all three parts of a well-documented nonconformity.
Option A is not correct, as it does not state the audit evidence or the requirement. Option B is not correct, as it does not specify the audit evidence or the statement of nonconformity. Option D is not correct, as it does not match the audit evidence or the requirement. References: 1: ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Nonconformity - Documenting.

NEW QUESTION # 27
You are conducting a third-party Stage 1 audit at ABC Ltd, a single-site organisation that manufactures wooden furniture. You interview the Technical Director to learn more about the organisation. The Technical Director explains that they have had a successful year and that obtaining ISO 9001 certification will support the further growth of the business. You ask for an overview of the organisation's structure and its interrelationships with external interested parties.
The Technical Director shows you a document detailing all business processes and interrelationships. You notice in this document that another organisation called Teak Ltd manufactures wooden furniture on behalf of ABC Ltd. The Technical Director confirms this capability has been accounted for in the scope of the quality management system. You learn that the furniture manufactured by Teak Ltd has accounted for 40% of the sales revenue over the previous 12 months.
Which two of the following options best describe how you would plan the audit of the interrelationship with Teak Ltd during the Stage 2 audit at ABC Ltd?

• A. Verify Teak Ltd supply arrangements as described in the ABC Ltd quality management system
• B. Verify the quality management system at Teak Ltd by conducting an audit at their site
• C. Verify the controls concerning customer property implemented by Teak Ltd
• D. Verify whether the design processes of Teak Ltd comply with ISO 9001
• E. Verify how ABC Ltd evaluates the performance of Teak Ltd
• F. Verify if Teak Ltd are certified to ISO 9001

Answer: A,E

Explanation:
According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 8.4, an organization is required to control the processes, products and services provided by external providers, including those that affect the quality of the organization's own products and services. This includes determining the controls to be applied to the external provision of processes, products and services, as well as the information to be communicated to the external providers. The organization is also required to monitor, measure, and evaluate the performance of the external providers and retain documented information of these activities.
Therefore, in the scenario given, ABC Ltd is responsible for controlling the processes, products and services provided by Teak Ltd, as they affect the quality of ABC Ltd's own products and services. This means that ABC Ltd should have established criteria and methods for evaluating the performance of Teak Ltd, as well as documented information of the results of such evaluation. ABC Ltd should also have defined the supply arrangements with Teak Ltd, including the specifications, requirements, and verification activities related to the products and services provided by Teak Ltd.
Hence, the best options to describe how to plan the audit of the interrelationship with Teak Ltd during the Stage 2 audit at ABC Ltd are A and D, as they are aligned with the requirements of ISO 9001:2015, clause 8.4.
The other options are either irrelevant or beyond the scope of the audit, as they do not pertain to the control of external provision by ABC Ltd.
References:
ISO 9001:2015(en), Quality management systems - Requirements, clause 8.4 ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.3.1 and 6.4.2 ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Training Course | IRCA Certified | BSI, section "Learning objectives" ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Course Material | 3FOLD Education Centre, module 5 and 6

NEW QUESTION # 28
Which two of the following aspects of a quality management system must the organisation continually improve?

• A. Effectiveness
• B. Applicability
• C. Efficiency
• D. Adaptability
• E. Suitability
• F. Responsiveness

Answer: A,C

Explanation:
According to the ISO 9001:2015 document, the organisation must continually improve the suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness of the quality management system1. However, among the six options given, only effectiveness is directly mentioned as an aspect of the quality management system that must be continually improved. Therefore, C is one of the correct answers.
Efficiency, on the other hand, is not explicitly stated as an aspect of the quality management system that must be continually improved, but it is implied by the quality management principle of improvement, which states that successful organisations have an ongoing focus on improvement2. One of the key benefits of applying this principle is improving operational effectiveness and efficiency2. Therefore, E is another correct answer.
Suitability, adaptability, responsiveness, and applicability are not aspects of the quality management system that must be continually improved, according to the ISO 9001:2015 document. They may be related to the quality management system, but they are not the focus of continual improvement.
Therefore, the correct answer is C and E.
References: 1: ISO 9001:2015 - Quality management systems - Requirements 2: ISO - Quality management principles

NEW QUESTION # 29
Who would be defined as a witness during a witness audit?
Choose two of the following options:

• A. An assessor for the accreditation body
• B. An auditor
• C. Someone with a qualification from the certification body
• D. An existing member of the audit team

Answer: A,B

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation: = According to the web search results from my internal tool, a witness audit is a technique used during an accreditation audit, where the accreditation body observes the performance and competence of the certification body auditors in conducting an audit12. A witness audit can also be used by a certification body to monitor and evaluate its own auditors3. During a witness audit, the following roles can be defined:
*An auditor: This is the person who is being witnessed by the accreditation body or the certification body. The auditor is responsible for conducting the audit according to the audit plan, criteria, and standards, and for providing audit evidence and findings123.
*An assessor for the accreditation body: This is the person who witnesses the auditor on behalf of the accreditation body. The assessor is responsible for evaluating the auditor's performance and competence, and for providing feedback and recommendations to the accreditation body123.
The other options are not defined as witnesses during a witness audit, according to the web search results from my internal tool. They are:
*Someone with a qualification from the certification body: This is not a specific role in a witness audit, as anyone who is involved in the audit process should have a qualification from the certification body. Moreover, having a qualification does not necessarily mean that the person is a witness or an auditor4.
*An existing member of the audit team: This is not a specific role in a witness audit, as the audit team consists of the auditors who are conducting the audit, not the ones who are witnessing it. The witness audit is a separate activity from the audit itself, and the witness should not interfere with the audit process or influence the audit outcome123.
Therefore, the correct answer is B and D.
References: 1: DQS Inc. | Witness Audits | Auditor Training 2: Have you ever been involved with a witness audit? - IFSQN 3: Certac - Witness Audit of Certification Bodies 4: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems

NEW QUESTION # 30
During a second-party audit of a dairy farm (by a potential customer) complying with ISO 9001:2015, the auditor verifies that there is large variability in the daily production of the milking yard. The current agreement with their only customer is to provide 2,000 litres per day. However, in the last two years, they have noticed an increasing variability in daily production.
If they produce less than 2,000 litres, they are penalised with a fine of 1.5 pesos for every litre that they do not provide. If they produce more than 2,000 litres, they use the extra milk to feed the pigs.
This process has been in operation for decades. The dairy farm was founded by the grandfather of the current owners, who did not want to alter the established practices.
The auditor raises a nonconformity on the basis that the process is not under control (Clause 8.1).
If you had been the auditor, which one of the following actions would you have accepted?

• A. Retain the current contract and try to sell the occasional surplus milk to a second customer.
• B. Modify the contract with the current customer to provide them with only 1,500 litres of milk per day and make an agreement with a second customer.
• C. Analyse the daily dispatch of milk for 7 days to determine its variability.
• D. Apply the existing process of addressing the risks and opportunities of milk production.

Answer: D

Explanation:
The action that the auditor would have accepted is:
*Option B: Apply the existing process of addressing the risks and opportunities of milk production. This option is correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 8.1 requires the organization to plan, implement and control the processes needed to meet the requirements for the provision of products and services, and to implement actions determined in clause 6.1, which refers to the actions to address risks and opportunities. The organization should apply the existing process of addressing the risks and opportunities of milk production, which may include identifying the sources of variability, assessing the potential impacts and consequences, determining and implementing appropriate actions to reduce or eliminate the variability, monitoring and measuring the effectiveness of the actions, and reviewing and updating the actions as necessary.
The following options are not correct:
*Option A: Modify the contract with the current customer to provide them with only 1,500 litres of milk per day and make an agreement with a second customer. This option is not correct because it does not address the root cause of the variability in the daily production of the milking yard, which may affect the quality and consistency of the products and services provided by the organization. It also does not demonstrate the organization's commitment to meet the customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, as required by ISO 9001:2015 clause 8.2.2.
*Option C: Retain the current contract and try to sell the occasional surplus milk to a second customer. This option is not correct because it does not address the root cause of the variability in the daily production of the milking yard, which may affect the quality and consistency of the products and services provided by the organization. It also does not demonstrate the organization's commitment to meet the customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, as required by ISO 9001:2015 clause 8.2.2.
*Option D: Analyse the daily dispatch of milk for 7 days to determine its variability. This option is not correct because it does not address the root cause of the variability in the daily production of the milking yard, which may affect the quality and consistency of the products and services provided by the organization. It also does not demonstrate the organization's commitment to implement actions to address risks and opportunities, as required by ISO 9001:2015 clause 8.1.
References:
*ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems - Requirements, Clause 8: Operation, Subclause 8.1:
Operational planning and control, Subclause 8.2: Requirements for products and services
*ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Course Material, Module 4: ISO 9001:2015 Requirements, Slide 23: Clause 8 - Operation
*ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Training Course - IRCA Certified, Section 4.2: ISO 9001:2015 Requirements, Subsection 4.2.8: Clause 8 - Operation
*Lead Auditor Exam Preparation Guide (EPG) Template - PECB, Section 3.2: Exam Content Outline, Subsection 3.2.1: Section 1 - Audit Fundamentals, Subsection 3.2.2: Section 2 - Audit Principles, Subsection
3.2.3: Section 3 - Audit Process, Subsection 3.2.4: Section 4 - Audit Competencies

NEW QUESTION # 31
According to ISO 19011, what two activities take place during the conduct of a audit follow-up?

• A. Verify corrections taken to fix the reported non-conformities
• B. Plan the next audit
• C. Determine feasibility of the audit
• D. Verify the effectiveness of the implemented corrective actions
• E. Verify legal compliance
• F. Assign roles and responsibilities of observers

Answer: A,D

Explanation:
According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.7, the audit follow-up is the process of verifying the completion and effectiveness of corrective actions taken by the auditee as a result of an audit. The audit follow-up can include two main activities:
Verifying the effectiveness of the implemented corrective actions: this means checking whether the actions taken by the auditee have addressed the root causes of the nonconformities and prevented their recurrence or occurrence in other areas. The verification can be done by reviewing documents, records, data, or other evidence provided by the auditee, or by conducting a follow-up audit on site or remotely.
Verifying corrections taken to fix the reported non-conformities: this means checking whether the auditee has corrected the nonconformities identified during the audit and eliminated their immediate effects. The verification can be done by reviewing documents, records, data, or other evidence provided by the auditee, or by conducting a follow-up audit on site or remotely.
The audit follow-up can be conducted as a separate audit or as part of a subsequent audit, depending on the audit programme, the audit objectives, the audit criteria, the audit scope, the audit risks, and the audit findings.
The audit follow-up should be planned and conducted in accordance with the same principles and processes as the initial audit, and the results should be documented and reported accordingly. References:
ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.7 ISO 19011 Management Systems Audit Checklist | Process Street, task 6.7.1 and 6.7.2 Conducting the Audit Follow-Up: When to Verify - The Auditor, section "Conducting the audit follow-up"

NEW QUESTION # 32
An internal auditor of a manufacturer of polystyrene packaging products for the electronics industry raised a nonconformity against section 10.3 of ISO 9001 in Report IA202. The nonconformity (NC 3) stated:
"The reject rate of the finished product of 9.7% needs improvement as it doesn't meet the stated objective of top management of 5%." As the third-party auditor reviewing the internal audit process, you come across the nonconformity. For corrective action, the Quality Manager conducted an investigation into the reject rates. He reported that the collection baskets for products ejecting from the moulding machines were not large enough. About 6% of products fell onto the wet and dirty factory floor. Management stated that replacing the baskets was too costly and ordered the Maintenance Manager to ensure that the floor was kept clean and dry to prevent rejects. The auditor later checked the factory floor, which was wet and dirty in places.
From the following nonconformities, select three that the auditor could raise to ISO 9001.

• A. 7.1.1 - The organisation failed to provide the required resources to prevent nonconforming products.
• B. 8.6 - Dirty products were released to the customer.
• C. 8.5.1 - Production operations were not properly controlled to avoid reject products.
• D. 10.2.1 - Conduct of an investigation was not sufficient to understand the cause of the nonconformity.
• E. 10.3 - The organisation did not continuously improve. Reject rates were unchanged.
• F. 7.3 - Staff were not aware that products were falling onto the factory floor.
• G. 7.1.4 - The factory environment is not suitably maintained to prevent dirty products.
• H. 9.2.2 - Report IA202 contained a poorly worded nonconformity (NC 3).

Answer: A,E,G

Explanation:
The auditor could raise the following nonconformities to ISO 9001 based on the scenario:
*Option A: 10.3 - The organisation did not continuously improve. Reject rates were unchanged. This option is correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 10.3 requires the organization to improve the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the quality management system. The organization did not demonstrate any improvement in reducing the reject rate of the finished product, which was a stated objective of top management. The corrective action taken by the organization was not effective in addressing the root cause of the problem and preventing its recurrence.
*Option B: 7.1.4 - The factory environment is not suitably maintained to prevent dirty products. This option is correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.1.4 requires the organization to determine, provide and maintain the environment necessary for the operation of its processes and to achieve conformity of products and services.
The organization did not ensure that the factory floor was clean and dry, which affected the quality of the products and increased the risk of nonconformity.
*Option C: 7.1.1 - The organization failed to provide the required resources to prevent nonconforming products. This option is correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.1.1 requires the organization to determine and provide the resources needed for the establishment, implementation, maintenance and continual improvement of the quality management system. The organization did not provide adequate collection baskets for the products ejecting from the moulding machines, which resulted in products falling onto the factory floor and becoming nonconforming.
The following options are not correct:
*Option D: 9.2.2 - Report IA202 contained a poorly worded nonconformity (NC 3). This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 9.2.2 does not specify the requirements for the wording of nonconformities in internal audit reports. The nonconformity (NC 3) stated by the internal auditor was clear and relevant to the audit criteria and audit evidence. The issue is not with the report, but with the corrective action taken by the organization.
*Option E: 8.6 - Dirty products were released to the customer. This option is not correct because ISO
9001:2015 clause 8.6 requires the organization to implement planned arrangements, at appropriate stages, to verify that the product and service requirements have been met. The scenario does not indicate that the dirty products were released to the customer, but that they were recalled and repaired then returned to the customers. The issue is not with the release, but with the production process and the environment.
*Option F: 7.3 - Staff were not aware that products were falling onto the factory floor. This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.3 requires the organization to ensure that the persons doing work under its control are aware of the quality policy, relevant quality objectives, their contribution to the effectiveness of the quality management system, and the implications of not conforming with the quality management system requirements. The scenario does not indicate that the staff were not aware of these aspects, but that the management did not provide adequate resources and environment for the staff to perform their work. The issue is not with the awareness, but with the management responsibility and resource provision.
*Option G: 10.2.1 - Conduct of an investigation was not sufficient to understand the cause of the nonconformity. This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 10.2.1 requires the organization to react to the nonconformity and, as applicable, take action to control and correct it and deal with the consequences. The scenario indicates that the Quality Manager conducted an investigation into the reject rates and identified the cause of the nonconformity. The issue is not with the investigation, but with the corrective action taken by the management.
*Option H: 8.5.1 - Production operations were not properly controlled to avoid reject products. This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 8.5.1 requires the organization to implement production and service provision under controlled conditions. The scenario indicates that the production operations were controlled by the moulding machines, which ejected the products into the collection baskets. The issue is not with the production operations, but with the size of the collection baskets and the condition of the factory floor.
References:
*ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems - Requirements
*ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Course Material, Module 6: Reporting Audit Findings, Slide 14: Writing Nonconformity Statements
*ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Training Course - IRCA Certified, Section 6.2: Reporting Audit Findings
*Lead Auditor Exam Preparation Guide (EPG) Template - PECB, Section 3.2: Exam Content Outline, Subsection 3.2.1: Section 1 - Audit Fundamentals, Subsection 3.2.2: Section 2 - Audit Principles, Subsection
3.2.3: Section 3 - Audit Process, Subsection 3.2.4: Section 4 - Audit Competencies

NEW QUESTION # 33
Select the word that best completes the sentence:

Answer:

Explanation:

Explanation:

According to the ISO - Management system standards page, the key benefits of an effective management system include improved operational effectiveness and efficiency, improved risk management and protection of people and the environment, and enhanced drive for innovation. The Integrated Use of Management System Standards (IUMSS) handbook also states that the purpose and objectives of management system standards are to help organizations improve their performance by specifying repeatable steps that organizations consciously implement to achieve their goals and objectives.
Therefore, the complete sentence is:
"The purpose of a management system standard is to improve the performance of an organisation."

NEW QUESTION # 34
......

Passing Key To Getting ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Certified Exam Engine PDF: https://www.dumpstillvalid.com/ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor-prep4sure-review.html

ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps Pass with Updated Tests Dumps: https://drive.google.com/open?id=18sNXBmy34d92sgWKUfjNoxA3kI16q-_q